| Title |
Antidepressants for treating depression in dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003944.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Dudas, Reem Malouf, Jenny McCleery, Tom Dening |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 154 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 53 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 10% |
| Ireland | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 58 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 131 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 10% |
| Scientists | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 389 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 19% |
| Unknown | 126 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 27% |
| Psychology | 39 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Unknown | 144 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#433,692
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#750
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,098
of 346,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.