Primary antifungal prophylaxis for cryptococcal disease in HIV-positive people
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Ajibola A Awotiwon, Samuel Johnson, George W Rutherford, Graeme Meintjes, Ingrid Eshun-Wilson
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||13||93%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||26||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||15||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||11||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||55||32%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||11||6%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||6||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||3%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||5||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 335,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.