| Title |
Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012047.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takashi Fujiwara, Akira Kuriyama, Yumi Kato, Toshio Fukuoka, Erika Ota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 46% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Greece | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 69 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,583,460
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,289
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,377
of 343,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.