↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012047.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Fujiwara, Akira Kuriyama, Yumi Kato, Toshio Fukuoka, Erika Ota

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,538,962
of 18,711,851 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,240
of 11,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,701
of 286,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,711,851 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.