↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following septal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012047.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Fujiwara, Akira Kuriyama, Yumi Kato, Toshio Fukuoka, Erika Ota

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 31 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 35 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,721,712
of 21,592,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,397
of 12,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,681
of 296,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,592,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.