| Title |
Combined use of hyperthermia and (chemo)radiation therapy for treating locally advanced cervix carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006377.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ludy Lutgens, Jacoba van der Zee, Madelon Pijls-Johannesma, Danielle Fm De Haas-Kock, Jeroen Buijsen, Ghislaine Apg van Mastrigt, Guido Lammering, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 36% |
| Engineering | 14 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,175
of 110,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.