↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sacral neuromodulation with implanted devices for urinary storage and voiding dysfunction in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Sacral neuromodulation with implanted devices for urinary storage and voiding dysfunction in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004202.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Peter Herbison, Edwin P Arnold

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 14 7%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 51 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 55 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,348,622
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,681
of 107,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.