| Title |
Physical therapy for Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006283.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lázaro J Teixeira, Juliana S Valbuza, Gilmar F Prado |
| Abstract |
Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis) is commonly treated by various physical therapy strategies and devices, but there are many questions about their efficacy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 446 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 14% |
| Researcher | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 80 | 18% |
| Unknown | 143 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 156 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,609,444
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,404
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,229
of 248,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.