| Title |
Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007710.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmad G, O'Flynn H, Attarbashi S, Duffy JM, Watson A |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,790,713
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,285
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,285
of 101,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.