↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Optimal intensity and type of leg exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Optimal intensity and type of leg exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008008.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahizan Zainuldin, Martin G Mackey, Jennifer A Alison

Abstract

Intensity of exercise is considered a key determinant of training response, however, no systematic review has investigated the effects of different levels of training intensity on exercise capacity, functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As type of training (continuous or interval) may also affect training response, the effects of the type of training in COPD also require investigation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 225 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 19%
Sports and Recreations 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 57 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,645,870
of 20,083,595 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,872
of 12,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,181
of 241,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,083,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.