Title |
Optimal intensity and type of leg exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008008.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rahizan Zainuldin, Martin G Mackey, Jennifer A Alison |
Abstract |
Intensity of exercise is considered a key determinant of training response, however, no systematic review has investigated the effects of different levels of training intensity on exercise capacity, functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As type of training (continuous or interval) may also affect training response, the effects of the type of training in COPD also require investigation. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 255 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 46 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
Researcher | 24 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
Other | 43 | 17% |
Unknown | 62 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 19% |
Sports and Recreations | 14 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Unknown | 76 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,026,449
of 23,905,640 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,462
of 12,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,332
of 145,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.