↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013086
Authors

Snezana Djurisic, Janus C Jakobsen, Sesilje B Petersen, Mette Kenfelt, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Christian Gluud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 9 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#910,571
of 20,091,699 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,174
of 12,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,411
of 295,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,091,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.