↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
35 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1193 Mendeley
Title
Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005528.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Innie Chen, Newton Opiyo, Emma Tavender, Sameh Mortazhejri, Tamara Rader, Jennifer Petkovic, Sharlini Yogasingam, Monica Taljaard, Sugandha Agarwal, Malinee Laopaiboon, Jason Wasiak, Suthit Khunpradit, Pisake Lumbiganon, Russell L Gruen, Ana Pilar Betran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 1192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 160 13%
Student > Bachelor 122 10%
Researcher 119 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 4%
Other 210 18%
Unknown 457 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 243 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 172 14%
Psychology 58 5%
Social Sciences 54 5%
Unspecified 30 3%
Other 133 11%
Unknown 503 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#538,211
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#939
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,386
of 353,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.