↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
Title
Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000337.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, Martyn J Parker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 255 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Postgraduate 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Other 63 24%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 50 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#9,126,901
of 16,995,670 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,934
of 11,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,277
of 372,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,995,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.