↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
92 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
Title
Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005179.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn A Birnie, Melanie Noel, Christine T Chambers, Lindsay S Uman, Jennifer A Parker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 459 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 17%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Researcher 50 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 9%
Other 33 7%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 114 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 19%
Psychology 64 14%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 130 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#293,529
of 18,719,001 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#584
of 11,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,100
of 287,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,719,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.