| Title |
Auditory integration training and other sound therapies for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003681.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yashwant Sinha, Natalie Silove, Andrew Hayen, Katrina Williams |
| Abstract |
Auditory integration therapy was developed as a technique for improving abnormal sound sensitivity in individuals with behavioural disorders including autism spectrum disorders. Other sound therapies bearing similarities to auditory integration therapy include the Tomatis Method and Samonas Sound Therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 364 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 15% |
| Researcher | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 22% |
| Unknown | 93 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 24% |
| Psychology | 60 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 109 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,354,031
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,872
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,356
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.