↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Auditory integration training and other sound therapies for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Auditory integration training and other sound therapies for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003681.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yashwant Sinha, Natalie Silove, Andrew Hayen, Katrina Williams

Abstract

Auditory integration therapy was developed as a technique for improving abnormal sound sensitivity in individuals with behavioural disorders including autism spectrum disorders. Other sound therapies bearing similarities to auditory integration therapy include the Tomatis Method and Samonas Sound Therapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 337 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 15%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Other 21 6%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 85 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 24%
Psychology 59 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 10%
Social Sciences 24 7%
Arts and Humanities 11 3%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 98 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,170,799
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,667
of 12,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,875
of 241,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.