↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Active mind‐body movement therapies as an adjunct to or in comparison with pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
Title
Active mind‐body movement therapies as an adjunct to or in comparison with pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012290.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louis McCusky Gendron, Andre Nyberg, Didier Saey, François Maltais, Yves Lacasse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 444 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 14%
Student > Bachelor 55 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 9%
Researcher 38 9%
Other 22 5%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 162 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 82 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 18%
Psychology 22 5%
Sports and Recreations 17 4%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Other 45 10%
Unknown 181 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,012,175
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,030
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,667
of 357,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.