↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003186.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory YH Lip, Dirk C Felmeden, Girish Dwivedi

Abstract

Elevated systemic blood pressure results in high intravascular pressure but the main complications, coronary heart disease (CHD), ischaemic strokes and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), are related to thrombosis rather than haemorrhage. Some complications related to elevated blood pressure, heart failure or atrial fibrillation, are themselves associated with stroke and thromboembolism. Therefore it is important to investigate if antithrombotic therapy may be useful in preventing thrombosis-related complications in patients with elevated blood pressure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 213 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 22%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 37 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,897,553
of 16,568,277 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,290
of 11,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,695
of 218,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#251
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,568,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.