| Title |
Early additional food and fluids for healthy breastfed full-term infants.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006462.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Becker GE, Remmington S, Remmington T |
| Abstract |
Widespread recommendations from health organisations encourage exclusive breastfeeding for six months. However the addition of other fluids or foods before six months is common practice in many countries and communities. This practice suggests perceived benefits of early supplementation or lack of awareness of the possible risks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 149 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 25% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2012.
All research outputs
#1,634,107
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,627
of 12,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,108
of 250,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.