↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011478.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Nama, Georgios Angelopoulos, Jeremy Twigg, John B Murdoch, Jo Bailey, Theresa A Lawrie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 19%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 45 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,950,216
of 20,419,783 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,449
of 12,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,002
of 291,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,419,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.