| Title |
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011261.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priti Mulimani, Victor CW Hoe, Melanie J Hayes, Jose Joy Idiculla, Adinegara BL Abas, Laxminarayan Karanth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 9% |
| Finland | 4 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 530 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 76 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 10% |
| Researcher | 32 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 94 | 18% |
| Unknown | 223 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 2% |
| Psychology | 11 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 64 | 12% |
| Unknown | 244 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,056,655
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,091
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,583
of 361,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.