| Title |
Surgery for complete (full‐thickness) rectal prolapse in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001758.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samson Tou, Steven R Brown, Richard L Nelson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 23% |
| Unknown | 83 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 37% |
| Unspecified | 27 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 89 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,463,388
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,572
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,693
of 396,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#218
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.