↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for the treatment of idiopathic chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for the treatment of idiopathic chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006348.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Adams, Taixiang Wu, Xunzhe Yang, Shusheng Tai, Sunita Vohra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 20%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Librarian 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,391,783
of 19,545,556 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,402
of 11,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,965
of 289,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,545,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.