The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Exercise therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005954.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Takken, Marco Van Brussel, Raoul H.H. Engelbert, Janjaap J van der Net, Wietse Kuis, Paul PJM Helders |
| Abstract |
Exercise therapy is considered an important component of the treatment of arthritis. The efficacy of exercise therapy has been reviewed in adults with rheumatoid arthritis but not in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 103 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 14% |
| Psychology | 15 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 114 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,216,408
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,838
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,627
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.