↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Social skills training for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Social skills training for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008223.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ole Jakob Storebø, Maria Skoog, Dorte Damm, Per Hove Thomsen, Erik Simonsen, Christian Gluud

Abstract

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children is associated with hyperactivity and impulsitivity, attention problems, and difficulties with social interactions. Pharmacological treatment may alleviate symptoms of ADHD but seldom solves difficulties with social interactions. Social skills training may benefit ADHD children in their social interactions. We examined the effects of social skills training on children's social competences, general behaviour, ADHD symptoms, and performance in school.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 333 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 18%
Student > Bachelor 53 16%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 47 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 26%
Psychology 87 26%
Social Sciences 30 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 62 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,039,384
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,674
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,156
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.