↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012414.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiannis A Philippou, Jae Hung Jung, Martin J Steggall, Stephen T O'Driscoll, Caitlin J Bakker, Joshua A Bodie, Philipp Dahm

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 35 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,680,764
of 17,525,923 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,139
of 11,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,852
of 331,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,525,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.