| Title |
Beta2‐adrenoceptor agonists for dysmenorrhoea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008585.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zbys Fedorowicz, Mona Nasser, Vanitha A Jagannath, Jessica H Beaman, Kiran Ejaz, Esther J van Zuuren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 15% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,327,641
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,102
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,565
of 177,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.