↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Meglitinide analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Meglitinide analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004654.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corri Black, Peter Donnelly, Linda McIntyre, Pamela Royle, Jonathan J Shepherd, Sian Thomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Unknown 249 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 84 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 91 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,316,044
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,571
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,507
of 88,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.