↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005656.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald A Grover, Tianjing Li, Colin CW Chong

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Other 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 22 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,471,048
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,951
of 12,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,545
of 155,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.