↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
Title
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003855.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Marjoribanks, Anne Lethaby, Cindy Farquhar

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Researcher 34 10%
Other 21 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 129 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Psychology 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 142 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,155,664
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,611
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,914
of 411,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.