↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
136 X users
facebook
37 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
747 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010264.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Zaina, Christy Tomkins‐Lane, Eugene Carragee, Stefano Negrini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 747 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 740 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 13%
Student > Bachelor 84 11%
Researcher 68 9%
Other 64 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 7%
Other 132 18%
Unknown 248 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 234 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 12%
Neuroscience 28 4%
Sports and Recreations 19 3%
Psychology 18 2%
Other 83 11%
Unknown 274 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#382,966
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#619
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,658
of 409,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.