↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
472 Mendeley
Title
Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012701.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J Schofield-Robinson, Sharon R Lewis, Andrew F Smith, Joanne McPeake, Phil Alderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 472 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 15%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Researcher 49 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 73 15%
Unknown 151 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 110 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 93 20%
Psychology 28 6%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 48 10%
Unknown 165 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#861,259
of 21,321,610 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,944
of 12,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,383
of 340,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.