Title |
Periodontal therapy as adjunctive treatment for gastric Helicobacter pylori infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009477.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qian Ren, Xiang Yan, YongNing Zhou, Wei Xin Li |
Abstract |
Helicobacter pylori is estimated to affect about half the world's population and is considered as the main cause of chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. Eradication of H. pylori infection accelerates ulcer healing and prevents relapse, reducing incidence of H. pylori-related gastric diseases. Numerous studies have provided evidence that the oral cavity could be a potential reservoir for H. pylori. The presence of oralH. pylori might affect the efficiency of eradication therapy and act as a causal force for its recurrence. Conversely, other investigators have indicated that the colonization and growth of H. pylori differs between the oral cavity and the stomach. Considering the open debate on the topic, it's necessary to clarify whether periodontal therapy is an effective adjunctive treatment for gastric H. pylori infection. To assess the effects of periodontal therapy plus eradication therapy versus eradication therapy alone for gastric H. pylori infection. The secondary objective is to compare the non-recurrence rate at long-term follow up in different treatment groups. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1946 to August 2015), EMBASE (1980 to August 2015), and the Chinese Biomedical Database (1978 to August 2015). We also searched both ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP portal in October 2015. We handsearched the reference lists of included studies to identify relevant trials. RCTs comparing periodontal therapy plus eradication treatment with eradication treatment alone, regardless of language of publication. Two reviewers selected the trials that met the inclusion criteria and extracted the details of each study independently. The data were pooled using both fixed-effect and random-effects models and results calculated as odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on an intention-to-treat analysis. However, because there was little difference in the results from these two models, we only reported the results from the fixed-effect model. We included seven small RCTs involving 691 participants aged 17 to 78 years in our meta analyses. The primary result showed that periodontal therapy combined with H. pylori eradication treatment increased the eradication rate of gastric H. pylori compared with eradication treatment alone (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.47 to 3.14; P < 0.0001) in people with H. pylori infection. In addition, periodontal therapy also had benefits on long-term gastric H. pylori eradication. After eradication of H. pylori, the non-recurrence rate of gastric H. pylori infection increased in participants treated with periodontal therapy compared with those who received eradication therapy alone (OR 3.60; 95% CI 2.11 to 6.15; P < 0.00001). According to the GRADE approach, the overall quality of the evidence was 'moderate' for eradication rate of gastric H.pylori and 'low' for non-recurrence rate of gastric H. pylori. Overall, periodontal therapy could increase the efficiency of H. pylori eradication and the non-recurrence rate of gastricH. pylori. In view of the limited number and quality of included studies, it will be necessary to conduct more well-designed, multicenter, and large-scale RCTs to determine the effects of periodontal therapy in eradicating gastric H. pylori and suppressing the recurrence of this bacterium in the stomach. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 11 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
Chile | 3 | 6% |
Finland | 3 | 6% |
Canada | 3 | 6% |
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 74% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 22% |
Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
Researcher | 14 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 54 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 59 | 34% |