The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Orthodontics for treating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006541.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Friedy Luther, Stephen Layton, Fraser McDonald |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 54 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 58 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,267,947
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,366
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,754
of 402,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#210
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.