↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
70 X users
patent
12 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008821.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Yang, Jiao Chen, Mingxiao Yang, Siyi Yu, Li Ying, Guan J Liu, Yu‐lan Ren, James M Wright, Fan‐rong Liang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 286 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 139 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 147 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#660,696
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,155
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,525
of 356,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.