↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007419.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianni Virgili, Mariacristina Parravano, Jennifer R Evans, Iris Gordon, Ersilia Lucenteforte

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 261 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Other 27 10%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 84 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 93 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,696,439
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,832
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,044
of 347,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.