↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007419.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianni Virgili, Mariacristina Parravano, Jennifer R Evans, Iris Gordon, Ersilia Lucenteforte

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 17 10%
Other 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 43 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 47 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,430,145
of 17,464,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,624
of 11,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,455
of 398,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,464,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.