↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Protocol-directed sedation versus non-protocol-directed sedation in mechanically ventilated intensive care adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
Title
Protocol-directed sedation versus non-protocol-directed sedation in mechanically ventilated intensive care adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009771.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leanne M Aitken, Tracey Bucknall, Bridie Kent, Marion Mitchell, Elizabeth Burmeister, Samantha J Keogh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Unspecified 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Researcher 21 8%
Other 16 6%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 82 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 44 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 17%
Unspecified 29 11%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 91 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,088,897
of 20,163,854 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,177
of 12,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,260
of 416,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,163,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.