↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Protocol‐directed sedation versus non‐protocol‐directed sedation in mechanically ventilated intensive care adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
Title
Protocol‐directed sedation versus non‐protocol‐directed sedation in mechanically ventilated intensive care adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009771.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leanne M Aitken, Tracey Bucknall, Bridie Kent, Marion Mitchell, Elizabeth Burmeister, Samantha J Keogh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 273 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 18 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 115 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 16%
Psychology 13 5%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 126 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,994,699
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,885
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,725
of 356,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.