↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled steroids with and without regular salmeterol for asthma: serious adverse events
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006922.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Cates, Stefanie Schmidt, Montse Ferrer, Ben Sayer, Samuel Waterson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 81 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 89 51%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,823,091
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,506
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,877
of 435,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.