↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011901.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Rubeta N Matin, Kai Yuen Wong, Roger Benjamin Aldridge, Alana Durack, Abha Gulati, Sue Ann Chan, Louise Johnston, Susan E Bayliss, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Colette O'Sullivan, Hamid Tehrani, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Other 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 64 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 73 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,446,782
of 17,947,665 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,599
of 11,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,928
of 400,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,947,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.