↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
Title
Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011902.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Rubeta N Matin, David R Thomson, Kai Yuen Wong, Roger Benjamin Aldridge, Rachel Abbott, Monica Fawzy, Susan E Bayliss, Matthew J Grainge, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Fiona M Walter, Hywel C Williams, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 421 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 15%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 7%
Other 30 7%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 142 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 9%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 157 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#590,339
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#991
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,881
of 450,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.