↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High-frequency ultrasound for diagnosing skin cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
High-frequency ultrasound for diagnosing skin cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jeffrey Bamber, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Colette O'Sullivan, Rubeta N Matin, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 277 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Student > Master 39 14%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 5%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 87 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Psychology 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 101 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,103,858
of 21,933,216 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,623
of 12,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,244
of 426,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,933,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.