| Title |
Exfoliative cytology for diagnosing basal cell carcinoma and other skin cancers in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Jacqueline Dinnes, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Rubeta N Matin, Colette O'Sullivan, Derek Roskell, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 82 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 91 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,340,530
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,832
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,734
of 446,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.