↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
Title
Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi Chuchu, Jacqueline Dinnes, Yemisi Takwoingi, Rubeta N Matin, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport, Jacqueline F Moreau, Oliver Bassett, Kathie Godfrey, Colette O'Sullivan, Fiona M Walter, Richard Motley, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 319 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 12%
Researcher 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 81 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 11%
Psychology 14 4%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 95 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,330,084
of 16,726,235 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,473
of 11,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,854
of 393,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,726,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.