↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009195.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlie C-T Hsu, Gigi NC Kwan, Dalveer Singh, John A Rophael, Chris Anthony, Mieke L van Driel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 32 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,419,993
of 15,662,972 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,074
of 11,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,482
of 386,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,662,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.