↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009195.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlie C-T Hsu, Gigi NC Kwan, Dalveer Singh, John A Rophael, Chris Anthony, Mieke L van Driel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 67 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Unspecified 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 74 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,985,865
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,440
of 12,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,132
of 436,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.