↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

De-intensified adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy versus standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy post transoral minimally invasive surgery for resectable HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
De-intensified adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy versus standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy post transoral minimally invasive surgery for resectable HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012939.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Howard, Raghav C Dwivedi, Liam Masterson, Prasad Kothari, Harry Quon, F. Christopher Holsinger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 51 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 56 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,091,825
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,893
of 12,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,836
of 436,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#173
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.