Title |
Vitamin and mineral supplementation for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in mid and late life
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011906.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne WS Rutjes, David A Denton, Marcello Di Nisio, Lee‐Yee Chong, Rajesh P Abraham, Aalya S Al‐Assaf, John L Anderson, Muzaffar A Malik, Robin WM Vernooij, Gabriel Martínez, Naji Tabet, Jenny McCleery |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 210 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 20 | 10% |
United States | 20 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 18 | 9% |
Australia | 9 | 4% |
Chile | 7 | 3% |
Canada | 7 | 3% |
France | 3 | 1% |
Ecuador | 3 | 1% |
Mexico | 3 | 1% |
Other | 25 | 12% |
Unknown | 95 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 141 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 16% |
Scientists | 31 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 580 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 97 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 69 | 12% |
Researcher | 52 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 5% |
Other | 90 | 16% |
Unknown | 197 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 5% |
Psychology | 23 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 18 | 3% |
Other | 106 | 18% |
Unknown | 224 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 537. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#46,707
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#840
of 431,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.