Antenatal interventions for fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Rachel Rayment, Susan J Brunskill, Peter W Soothill, David J Roberts, James B Bussel, Michael F Murphy
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||24||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||19||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||15||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||10||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||64||40%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||15||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 110,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.