| Title |
Inositol for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012378.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marian G Showell, Rebecca Mackenzie‐Proctor, Vanessa Jordan, Ruth Hodgson, Cindy Farquhar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 383 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 18% |
| Unknown | 139 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 10% |
| Unknown | 158 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,218,170
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,557
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,485
of 444,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.