↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inositol for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Inositol for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012378.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marian G Showell, Rebecca Mackenzie-Proctor, Vanessa Jordan, Ruth Hodgson, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 56 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,949,585
of 17,520,445 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,558
of 11,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,552
of 394,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,520,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.