↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tranexamic acid for patients with nasal haemorrhage (epistaxis)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Tranexamic acid for patients with nasal haemorrhage (epistaxis)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004328.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Joseph, Pablo Martinez-Devesa, Jenny Bellorini, Martin J Burton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 45 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#350,578
of 17,464,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#768
of 11,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,766
of 393,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,464,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.