↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006205.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vishal M Bulsara, Helen V Worthington, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Janet E Clarkson, David I Conway, Michaelina Macluskey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 14 6%
Researcher 12 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 92 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 100 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,165,547
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,418
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,488
of 447,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.