↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006205.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vishal M Bulsara, Helen V Worthington, Anne-Marie Glenny, Janet E Clarkson, David I Conway, Michaelina Macluskey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 38 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#740,241
of 17,520,458 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,883
of 11,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,381
of 394,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,520,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.