↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006205.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vishal M Bulsara, Helen V Worthington, Anne-Marie Glenny, Janet E Clarkson, David I Conway, Michaelina Macluskey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 13 7%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 70 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 74 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#911,380
of 22,053,897 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,034
of 12,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,183
of 423,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,053,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.