| Title |
Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care versus standard care for people with schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007964.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Jones, David Hacker, Jun Xia, Alan Meaden, Claire B Irving, Sai Zhao, Jue Chen, Chunhu Shi |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 28% |
| Canada | 6 | 6% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 24% |
| Scientists | 17 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 470 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 54 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 18% |
| Unknown | 153 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 15% |
| Psychology | 57 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 54 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 166 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#570,882
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,063
of 12,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,181
of 444,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.