| Title |
Laparoscopic entry techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006583.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaity Ahmad, Jade Baker<sup>a</sup>, John Finnerty<sup>a</sup>, Kevin Phillips, Andrew Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Spain | 3 | 17% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 106 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 122 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,743,271
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,749
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,616
of 447,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.