↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005431.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Almutez Gharaibeh, Howard I Savage, Roberta W Scherer, Morton F Goldberg, Kristina Lindsley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 201 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 43 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,112,706
of 18,110,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,821
of 11,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,593
of 348,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,110,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.