↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005431.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Almutez Gharaibeh, Howard I Savage, Roberta W Scherer, Morton F Goldberg, Kristina Lindsley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 292 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Student > Master 39 13%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 71 24%
Unknown 71 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 11%
Unspecified 14 5%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 78 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,275,064
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,936
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,803
of 436,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.